Il Mosè di Spinoza: liberatore o tiranno?

novitàdigital Il Mosè di Spinoza: liberatore o tiranno?

Articolo

rivista	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA
sezione	Online First
titolo	Il Mosè di Spinoza: liberatore o tiranno? Spinoza’s Moses: Liberator or Tyrant?
autore	Francesco Toto
editore	Vita e Pensiero
formato	Articolo \| Pdf
online da	07-2021
doi	10.26350/001050_000271
issn	0035-6247 (stampa) \| 1827-7926 (digitale)

€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Computer
con Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
con App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Descrizione
The figure of Moses recurs within Spinoza’s Theologico-Political Treatise within the discussions of all the key themes of the work: prophecy, election, law narratives, miracles, and so on. Yet Spinoza’s uses of this figure are not always consistent, and readings of it offered by interpreters can be deeply discordant. Reviewing the places in which Spinoza appeals to Moses as a prophet and as a lawgiver, the present article aims to highlight the tensions that run through this variety of uses both on the epistemological and on the ethical-political level, and to show how these tensions force us to abandon, in reading Spinoza’s work, a rigid assumption of coherence. keywords Spinoza, Moses, Prophecy, Ethics, Politics Biografia dell'autore Università degli Studi di “Roma Tre”, Roma. Email: francesco.toto@uniroma3.it

Descrizione

The figure of Moses recurs within Spinoza’s Theologico-Political Treatise within the discussions of all the key themes of the work: prophecy, election, law narratives, miracles, and so on. Yet Spinoza’s uses of this figure are not always consistent, and readings of it offered by interpreters can be deeply discordant. Reviewing the places in which Spinoza appeals to Moses as a prophet and as a lawgiver, the present article aims to highlight the tensions that run through this variety of uses both on the epistemological and on the ethical-political level, and to show how these tensions force us to abandon, in reading Spinoza’s work, a rigid assumption of coherence.