Per una semantica bidimensionale e una semiotica tripolare. Il dialogo tra Bühler e Meinong, oltre Russell

novitàdigital Per una semantica bidimensionale e una semiotica
tripolare. Il dialogo tra Bühler e Meinong, oltre Russell

Articolo

rivista	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA
fascicolo	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2021 - 4. Alexius Meinong and His Contemporaries
titolo	Per una semantica bidimensionale e una semiotica tripolare. Il dialogo tra Bühler e Meinong, oltre Russell For a Two-Dimensional Semantics and a Tripolar Semiotics. The Dialogue between Bühler and Meinong, beyond Russell
Autore	Savina Raynaud
Editore	Vita e Pensiero
formato	Articolo \| Pdf
online da	03-2022
doi	10.26350/001050_000305
issn	0035-6247 (stampa) \| 1827-7926 (digitale)

€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Computer
con Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
con App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Descrizione
Vienna and Graz are here related because of the Austro-German philosophical context, which pulls philosophy closer to psychology and finds true pathfinders in Brentano’s psychology from an empirical standpoint and in Külpe’s psychology of thought. Written exchanges are considered: letters between Bühler and Meinong (1907-1920) and quotations and references by Bühler (esp. 1926-1934) concerning private Meinong communications and the Meinong school (Ameseder, Mally). Nevertheless, Meinong is not ready to encounter Bühler’s pivotal topic, his turning point in response to the crisis in psychology, i.e. his theory of language – the valuable sign-exchange – which unifies conflicting approaches to psychic life, and objectifies intra- and intersubjective dynamism. Meinong’s focus remains his theory of objects. Though Russell ascribes the development of his own theory of description in referential semantics to Meinong’s problematic ontology, Russell’s empiricist assumptions prohibit that «transformation of positivism» (Lindenfeld) towards semantic and ontological pluralism, which takes place in European thought, due even to Meinong. keywords Alexius Meinong, Karl Bühler, Bertrand Russell, Semantics, Psychology of Thought Biografia dell'autore Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano. Email: savina.raynaud@unicatt.it

Descrizione

Vienna and Graz are here related because of the Austro-German philosophical context, which pulls philosophy closer to psychology and finds true pathfinders in Brentano’s psychology from an empirical standpoint and in Külpe’s psychology of thought. Written exchanges are considered: letters between Bühler and Meinong (1907-1920) and quotations and references by Bühler (esp. 1926-1934) concerning private Meinong communications and the Meinong school (Ameseder, Mally). Nevertheless, Meinong is not ready to encounter Bühler’s pivotal topic, his turning point in response to the crisis in psychology, i.e. his theory of language – the valuable sign-exchange – which unifies conflicting approaches to psychic life, and objectifies intra- and intersubjective dynamism. Meinong’s focus remains his theory of objects. Though Russell ascribes the development of his own theory of description in referential semantics to Meinong’s problematic ontology, Russell’s empiricist assumptions prohibit that «transformation of positivism» (Lindenfeld) towards semantic and ontological pluralism, which takes place in European thought, due
even to Meinong.