Pierre Ceffons di Clairvaux. La questione dei significabilia complexe intorno al 1350. I. Edizione della quaestio 25 della Lectura super I Sententiarum

Name: Pierre Ceffons di Clairvaux. La questione dei significabilia complexe intorno al 1350. I. Edizione della quaestio 25 della Lectura super I Sententiarum
Brand: Vita e Pensiero
Price: 6.00 EUR
Availability: OnlineOnly

digital

Pierre Ceffons di Clairvaux.
La questione dei significabilia complexe intorno al 1350.
I. Edizione della quaestio 25 della Lectura super I Sententiarum

Articolo

Rivista

RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA

Fascicolo

RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2015 - 4

Titolo

Pierre Ceffons di Clairvaux. La questione dei significabilia complexe intorno al 1350. I. Edizione della quaestio 25 della Lectura super I Sententiarum

Autore

Andrea Nannini

Editore

Vita e Pensiero

Formato

Articolo |

Pdf

Pagine

Online da

03-2016

Issn

0035-6247 (stampa) | 1827-7926 (digitale)

€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Computer
con Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
con App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Descrizione

Pierre Ceffons of Clairvaux, a relatively unknown philosopher of the mid-XIV century (little studied by Damasus Trapp, Amos Corbini and Christopher Schabel), is far from being irrelevant in the general economy of late scholasticism. This cistercian Master, whose Sentence Commentary dates from 1348-1349, is one of the first Masters to strongly react towards the significabilia complexe’s doctrine. In his quaestion 25 on the first book of Sentences, whose edition is here offered – implicitly using most of the material coming from John of Mirecourt’s quaestio 7 on the first book of Sentences – explicitly attacks Gregory of Rimini’s theory of significabile complexe, focusing particularly on the problem of the metaphysical consistence of those significabilia complexe. The result is one of the first attempt to criticize the theologically-impossible-to-admit significabile complexe’s consistency and its dangerous attitude to become an aeternal entity distinct from God, trying to get back to a more usual propositional-truth contest.