«Para dejar atónito al género humano». El Tratado de Teodicea (1872) de Bartolomé Herrera y la primera polémica peruana contra la filosofía moderna

Name: «Para dejar atónito al género humano». El Tratado de Teodicea (1872) de Bartolomé Herrera y la primera polémica peruana contra la filosofía moderna
Brand: Vita e Pensiero
Price: 6.00 EUR
Availability: OnlineOnly

digital

«Para dejar atónito al género humano». El Tratado de Teodicea (1872) de Bartolomé Herrera y la primera polémica peruana contra la filosofía moderna

Articolo

Rivista

RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA

Fascicolo

RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2019 - 3

Titolo

«Para dejar atónito al género humano». El Tratado de Teodicea (1872) de Bartolomé Herrera y la primera polémica peruana contra la filosofía moderna

«Leaving the Human Race Astonished». Bartolomé Herrera’s Tratado de Teodicea (1872) and the First Peruvian Polemics against Modern Philosophy

Autore

César Félix Sánchez Martínez

Editore

Vita e Pensiero

Formato

Articolo |

Pdf

Pagine

Online da

10-2019

Doi

10.26350/001050_000134

Issn

0035-6247 (stampa) | 1827-7926 (digitale)

€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Computer
con Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
con App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Descrizione

Polemical preoccupation with modern philosophy and its reception does not constitute for the Peruvian thinker Bartolomé Herrera (1808-1864) in his almost unknown Tratado de Teodicea (1872), a mere theoretical matter, but an act of reflexive importance: the reception of enlightened and post-enlightened European thought in a horizon of identity construction sometimes truncated. Hence the special attention, virulence and erudition that Herrera demonstrates in the second part of the Treaty on modern philosophy. There, far from encountering a mere chapter in a text of natural theology, we are before one of the most meaningful cores of the book, where philosophers like Cousin, Spinoza, Fichte, Kant and Hegel, among others, are discussed. Herrera’s intention is always to save the transcendence of God and His nature of necessary Being, against the philosophical pantheism and its «horribly absurd» moral consequences.