Vom Urvertrauen zur Wirklichkeit zum Theismus. Eine systematische Darstellung und Verteidigung des Küngschen »Gottesbeweises«

Name: Vom Urvertrauen zur Wirklichkeit zum Theismus. Eine systematische Darstellung und Verteidigung des Küngschen »Gottesbeweises«
Brand: Vita e Pensiero
Price: 6.00 EUR
Availability: OnlineOnly

digital

Articolo

Rivista

RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA

Fascicolo

RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2022 - 4

Titolo

Vom Urvertrauen zur Wirklichkeit zum Theismus. Eine systematische Darstellung und Verteidigung des Küngschen »Gottesbeweises«

From Protofaith to Reality to Theism. A Systematic Exposition and Defence of Küng’s «Proof of God’s Existence»

Autore

Dragan D. Jakovljević

Editore

Vita e Pensiero

Formato

Articolo |

Pdf

Pagine

Online da

01-2023

Doi

10.26350/001050_000360

Issn

0035-6247 (stampa) | 1827-7926 (digitale)

€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Computer
con Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
con App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Descrizione

In this essay, the author first reconstructs the goal setting and initial assumptions, starting from which the well-known reformist Catholic theologian Hans Küng strives in the tradition of the so-called «Physico-theological evidence» to argue in favor of the existence of God. At the same time, the key topic is the topic of fundamental trust in reality in relation to which the dilemma of worldview atheism or theism is formed. The author pays special attention to explaining the specific internal rationality of fundamental theistic trust in Küng’s interpretation. In further consideration, three possibilities of interpretation or reinterpretation of Küng’s central thesis are presented. Still, at the same time, certain deficits in his argumentation are pointed out – above all, the absence of the Christological dimension of the consideration. After rejecting in detail the criticism directed at this consideration from the position of J.L. Mackie’s neo-positivism, the author concludes that Küng’s concept reconstructed here deserves further reflection, a further explanation of his approach to establishing faith in God, which would include certain modifications in line with the current discussion.