Il tuo browser non supporta JavaScript!

Idem re differunt ratione. Frege ‘interprete’ di Tommaso d’Aquino a proposito della distinzione fra essenza ed esistenza

digital Idem re differunt ratione. Frege ‘interprete’
di Tommaso d’Aquino a proposito della distinzione fra essenza
ed esistenza
Articolo
rivista RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA
fascicolo RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2015 - 1 - 2
titolo Idem re differunt ratione. Frege ‘interprete’ di Tommaso d’Aquino a proposito della distinzione fra essenza ed esistenza
autore
editore Vita e Pensiero
formato Articolo | Pdf
online da 10-2015
issn 00356247 (stampa) | 18277926 (digitale)
€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

The discussion about the distinction in creatures between essence and existence, as well as that of their identity in God, doesn’t cease to draw the attention of philosophers, and not only those usually known as ‘Thomists’. The aim of this article is rereading some of Aquinas’s texts on this topic, starting from the well known Frege’s Sense and Reference. Frege’s distinction between sense and reference seems to be particularly useful not only to better understand some of Aquinas’s passages, but sometimes even to better translate some of Aquinas’ Latin idiomaticLatin expressions. The result of such an interpretation is that «essence» and «existence» are not two different objects designated by their corresponding names «res» and «ens», as pointed out by Avicenna and those who still defend the ‘real’ distinction, but two different senses, expressed by those names, of the same object designed by them.