Postpaesaggio, scempio ambientale, catastrofe climatica. La parrhesia di Andrea Zanzotto, in memoria

novitàdigital Postpaesaggio, scempio ambientale, catastrofe climatica.
La parrhesia di Andrea Zanzotto, in memoria

Articolo

rivista	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA
fascicolo	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2021 - 4. Alexius Meinong and His Contemporaries
titolo	Postpaesaggio, scempio ambientale, catastrofe climatica. La parrhesia di Andrea Zanzotto, in memoria Post-Landscape, Environmental Destruction, Climate Catastrophe. The parrhesia of Andrea Zanzotto, in Memory
Autore	Guido Boffi
Editore	Vita e Pensiero
formato	Articolo \| Pdf
online da	03-2022
doi	10.26350/001050_000309
issn	0035-6247 (stampa) \| 1827-7926 (digitale)

€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Computer
con Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
con App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Descrizione
Michel Foucault taught us how to reinterpret the Greco-Roman applications of the concept of parrhesia as the attempt to consider truth-telling as a specific activity, or as a role, a form of criticism coming from ‘below’ and directed towards ‘above’. The present memoir of Andrea Zanzotto shows how he voiced this role in poetry and prose. He did so to question the reader, his individual or collective audience, about the annihilation of the landscape, the devastating counterfeiting of the environment, the subversion of the climate. He defended the land he sang about with desperate frankness. keywords Andrea Zanzotto, parrhesia, Landscape, Environment, Climate Biografia dell'autore Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano. Email: guido.boffi@unicatt.it

Descrizione

Michel Foucault taught us how to reinterpret the Greco-Roman applications of the concept of parrhesia as the attempt to consider truth-telling as a specific activity, or as a role, a form of criticism coming from ‘below’ and directed towards ‘above’. The present memoir of Andrea Zanzotto shows how he voiced this role in poetry and prose. He did so to question the reader, his individual or collective audience, about the annihilation of the landscape, the devastating counterfeiting of the environment, the subversion of the climate. He defended the land he sang about with desperate frankness.