Democrazia «perlaborativa» In margine a Conviction religieuse et responsabilité politique di Jean-Marc Ferry

digital

Articolo

rivista	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA
fascicolo	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2015 - 1 - 2
titolo	Democrazia «perlaborativa» In margine a Conviction religieuse et responsabilité politique di Jean-Marc Ferry
autore	Paolo Gomarasca
editore	Vita e Pensiero
formato	Articolo \| Pdf
online da	10-2015
issn	00356247 (stampa) \| 18277926 (digitale)

€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Computer
con Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
con App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Descrizione
The aim of this paper is to discuss Ferry’s views on deliberative democracy. Particularly, it deals with the contentious role of religion in the public sphere of contemporary post-secular societies. How can we legitimate this inclusion? Is it possible to justify the compatibility between «religious convictions» and the so-called «public reason»? The article argues that Ferry’s suggestion of a «perlaborative» democracy can be a valid argument. «Perlaboration», the French translation of Freud’s term Durcharbeitung, involves a process of reciprocal adjustment between religions and public reason: on the one hand, religious convictions in pluralistic democratic debate are called to accept the perspective of argumentative discussion; on the other hand, the public debate needs to be inclusive of different standards of justification, like narrative reasoning and story-telling, which are typical of religious citizens.

Descrizione

The aim of this paper is to discuss Ferry’s views on deliberative democracy. Particularly, it deals with the contentious role of religion in the public sphere of contemporary post-secular societies. How can we legitimate this inclusion? Is it possible to justify the compatibility between «religious convictions» and the so-called «public reason»? The article argues that Ferry’s suggestion of a «perlaborative» democracy can be a valid argument. «Perlaboration», the French translation of Freud’s term Durcharbeitung, involves a process of reciprocal adjustment between religions and public reason: on the one hand, religious convictions in pluralistic democratic debate are called to accept the perspective of argumentative discussion; on the other hand, the public debate needs to be inclusive of different standards of justification, like narrative reasoning and story-telling, which are typical of religious citizens.