Rileggendo Eros e civiltà sessant’anni dopo. Una breve Wirkungsgeschichte

digital

Articolo

rivista	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA
fascicolo	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 4
titolo	Rileggendo Eros e civiltà sessant’anni dopo. Una breve Wirkungsgeschichte Rereading Eros and Civilization Sixty Years Later. A Short Wirkungsgeschichte
autore	Pio Colonnello
editore	Vita e Pensiero
formato	Articolo \| Pdf
online da	02-2021
doi	10.26350/001050_000232
issn	00356247 (stampa) \| 18277926 (digitale)

€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Computer
con Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
con App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Descrizione
Nowadays we can reread Eros and Civilization as the fresco or the mirror of the society and the postwar era, of which Marcuse was a passionate interpreter. But we can read it at the same time as the proposal of fruitful instances of emancipation, bearing in mind the relations of the Frankfurter philosopher with the culture of his time, with Psychoanalysis, Freudism, Marxian inspiration, Utopian Thought. A profile, albeit in broad outline, of the Wirkungsgeschichte of Eros and civilization – often associated with Marcuse’s other great work, One-Dimensional Man –, cannot ignore the reference to both Hannah Arendt, another ‘spurious’ student of Martin Heidegger, and to a ‘Theological-political’ movement – which arose in the same years – known with the name of ‘Liberation Theology’. Furthermore, the fact that, behind some new theological orientations of the 1960s, in particular behind the ‘Political’ Theology of Johann Baptist Metz and Jürgen Moltmann, some researchers have identified the influence exercised by Marcuse and the exponents of the Frankfurt School, as well as by Walter Benjamin. keywords Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, Liberation Theology, Utopian Thought Biografia dell'autore Università della Calabria. Email: pio.colonnello@gmail.com

Descrizione

Nowadays we can reread Eros and Civilization as the fresco or the mirror of the society and the postwar era, of which Marcuse was a passionate interpreter. But we can read it at the same time as the proposal of fruitful instances of emancipation, bearing in mind the relations of the Frankfurter philosopher with the culture of his time, with Psychoanalysis, Freudism, Marxian inspiration, Utopian Thought. A profile, albeit in broad outline, of the Wirkungsgeschichte of Eros and civilization – often associated with Marcuse’s other great work, One-Dimensional Man –, cannot ignore the reference to both Hannah Arendt, another ‘spurious’ student of Martin Heidegger, and to a ‘Theological-political’ movement – which arose in the same years – known with the name of ‘Liberation Theology’. Furthermore, the fact that, behind some new theological orientations of the 1960s, in particular behind the ‘Political’ Theology of Johann Baptist Metz and Jürgen Moltmann, some researchers have identified the influence exercised by Marcuse and the exponents of the Frankfurt School, as well as by Walter Benjamin.