Edith Stein: un dialogo tra i maestri. Tentativo di confronto tra la fenomenologia di Husserl e la filosofia di San Tommaso

digital

Articolo

rivista	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA
fascicolo	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2014 - 3
titolo	Edith Stein: un dialogo tra i maestri. Tentativo di confronto tra la fenomenologia di Husserl e la filosofia di San Tommaso
autore	Samuele Pinna
editore	Vita e Pensiero
formato	Articolo \| Pdf
online da	10-2014
issn	00356247 (stampa) \| 18277926 (digitale)

€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Computer
con Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
con App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Descrizione
The essay of E. Stein’s tries to make a comparison between the E. Husserl’s phenomenology and Thomas Aquinas’ philosophy. Starting from the idea of the philosophy, E. Stein focuses on the link between the two above-mentioned ways of thinking (the phenomenology at one side and the philosophy at the other side), which are different for social and historical background and for the epistemological content. Tough Husserl’s phenomenology and St. Thomas’ philosophy have some common points, the intentionality of knowledge isn’t compatible with the thomism’s realism, which deals with the being’s intelligibility. A general agreement in a framework of disagreement: this expression, coined by C. Fabro, could represent the essence of E. Stein’s work, in the comparison between her previous teacher, from whom she was step by step distancing herself (Husserl) and the medieval teacher, who was always more accepted and followed by E. Stein (St. Thomas). Keywords: phenomenology, Thomism, verity, ontology, intuition of essences

Descrizione

The essay of E. Stein’s tries to make a comparison between the E. Husserl’s phenomenology and Thomas Aquinas’ philosophy. Starting from the idea of the philosophy, E. Stein focuses on the link between the two above-mentioned ways of thinking (the phenomenology at one side and the philosophy at the other side), which are different for social and historical background and for the epistemological content. Tough Husserl’s phenomenology and St. Thomas’ philosophy have some common points, the intentionality of knowledge isn’t compatible with the thomism’s realism, which deals with the being’s intelligibility. A general agreement in a framework of disagreement: this expression, coined by C. Fabro, could represent the essence of E. Stein’s work, in the comparison between her previous teacher, from whom she was step by step distancing herself (Husserl) and the medieval teacher, who was always more accepted and followed by E. Stein (St. Thomas).

Keywords: phenomenology, Thomism, verity, ontology, intuition of essences