Il tuo browser non supporta JavaScript!

Il valore empirico delle recenti teorie cosmologiche e l’incongruo passaggio a una protologia naturalistica

digital Il valore empirico delle recenti teorie cosmologiche e l’incongruo passaggio a una protologia naturalistica
Articolo
rivista RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA
fascicolo RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2014 - 4
titolo Il valore empirico delle recenti teorie cosmologiche e l’incongruo passaggio a una protologia naturalistica
autore
editore Vita e Pensiero
formato Articolo | Pdf
online da 01-2015
issn 00356247 (stampa) | 18277926 (digitale)
€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

This work presents the attempt by science to unfold the origin of the universe, pointing out the limits and contradictions. It critically analyses the universe identification with a Turing’s machine and the possibility of a definitive theory that may give a thorough understanding of it. It explains the equivocal and contradictory assumptions of the idea itself on the origin of the universe in contemporary naturalism. It finally shows the groundlessness of a protology based on the M-theory, which is thought to be the most meaningful «Theory of Everything». Starting from Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, the final arguments show that a theory which should be thoroughly explicative, not falsifiable, necessarily true and unconditionally grounded can’t be conceived. Furthermore, it is contradictory to deduce by the M-theory a creation from the nothingness of the universe and then the old metaphysical questions reproposed by Hawking are not scientifically solved. Finally a contradictory Heraclitean position can be avoided only admitting that at the origin of everything there isn’t an event, but a state.