Il tuo browser non supporta JavaScript!

Inconsistenza fondativa dell’eraclitismo naturalistico

digital Inconsistenza fondativa
dell’eraclitismo naturalistico
Articolo
rivista RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA
fascicolo RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2019 - 1
titolo Inconsistenza fondativa dell’eraclitismo naturalistico
Foundational Inconsistency of Naturalistic Heracliteanism
autore
editore Vita e Pensiero
formato Articolo | Pdf
online da 04-2019
doi 10.26350/001050_000098
issn 00356247 (stampa) | 18277926 (digitale)
€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

This work aims to show the groundlessness of the Heraclitean conceptions subtended to contemporary naturalism starting from the same scientific knowledge. It clarifies how the description of the physical world remains entrusted to mathematical theories even in the changed perspectives, with all the limits that such theories entail. The work considers the issues of becoming emerging from modern experimental findings and critically analyzes their relationship with the principle of causality and with the different deterministic conceptions. It also correlates and leads the concept of becoming to the ideas of diversity, change, multiplicity. The conclusive arguments show that science is neither able to characterize the becoming by explaining its apparent contradiction, nor to deny the principle of the primacy of the act. They also prove that the hypothesis of a spontaneous becoming is sustainable only if it is not original. Finally, they highlight the absence of a sufficient reason in modern Heracliteanism, not so much for a fixed variety of forms, as for their changing succession.

keywords

Heracliteanism, Contemporary Naturalism, Causality, Primacy of the Act, Spontaneous Becoming

Biografia dell'autore

antonino.ventura@unicatt.it