Dal comprendersi-in-esistenza e dall’angoscia kierkegaardiana e heideggeriana alla fondazione di un’ontologia esistenziale della speranza in Ernst Bloch

digital

Articolo

rivista	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA
fascicolo	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2015 - 1 - 2
titolo	Dal comprendersi-in-esistenza e dall’angoscia kierkegaardiana e heideggeriana alla fondazione di un’ontologia esistenziale della speranza in Ernst Bloch
autore	Arno Munster
editore	Vita e Pensiero
formato	Articolo \| Pdf
online da	10-2015
issn	00356247 (stampa) \| 18277926 (digitale)

€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Computer
con Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
con App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Descrizione
The Spirit of Utopia (1918-1923) is the best proof of the permanent oscillation (swing) of Ernst Bloch’s thought between an utopian metaphysics and an ontological thought of existence and being-in-the-world which is influenced by Kierkegaard and Heidegger. That’s a philosophy of «understanding-of-oneself-in-existence» and of «real-life experience» of the religious and moral «affects», of this thought of the «interiority of being» in Kierkegaard, which is also a leitmotiv of Bloch’s philosophy of the «encounter-with-oneself» (Selbstbegegnung). Simultaneously, Bloch proceeds to an extension of Kierkegaard’s concept of «profound interiority» toward a «being of a demoniac (interior) productivity», i.e. unto a «being maximizing one’s potential». In this perspective, Bloch is opposing Kierkegaard and Heidegger, who describes the fundamental ontological situation of man as essentially determined by fear (anxiety), despair and the danger to fall into the «depths of nothingness«, meanwhile in Bloch’s eyes hope is destroying fear, overtaking despair.

Descrizione

The Spirit of Utopia (1918-1923) is the best proof of the permanent oscillation (swing) of Ernst Bloch’s thought between an utopian metaphysics and an ontological thought of existence and being-in-the-world which is influenced by Kierkegaard and Heidegger. That’s a philosophy of «understanding-of-oneself-in-existence» and of «real-life experience» of the religious and moral «affects», of this thought of the «interiority of being» in Kierkegaard, which is also a leitmotiv of Bloch’s philosophy of the «encounter-with-oneself» (Selbstbegegnung). Simultaneously, Bloch proceeds to an extension of Kierkegaard’s concept of «profound interiority» toward a «being of a demoniac (interior) productivity», i.e. unto a «being maximizing one’s potential». In this perspective, Bloch is opposing Kierkegaard and Heidegger, who describes the fundamental ontological situation of man as essentially determined by fear (anxiety), despair and the danger to fall into the «depths of nothingness«, meanwhile in Bloch’s eyes hope is destroying fear, overtaking despair.